Cain's Sacrifice

Notable Sources

All Sources

Cain's Distress

TANAKH

Cain's emotional response to God's rejection of his offering reveals the depth of his distress and fallen countenance. The Torah recounts the offerings made by Cain and Abel, highlighting God's favor towards Abel's offering over Cain's, leading to Cain's emotional turmoil.

In the course of time, Cain brought an offering to יהוה from the fruit of the soil; and Abel, for his part, brought the choicest of the firstlings of his flock. יהוה paid heed to Abel and his offering, but to Cain and his offering [God] paid no heed. Cain was much distressed and his face fell.

Genesis 4:3-5

The Intellectual Error of Cain

HALAKHAH

Cain's intellectual error, according to R. Joseph Albo, was his belief in the moral equality of humans and animals, which led him to reject animal sacrifice and ultimately resulted in fratricide and societal breakdown. Rabbi J. David Bleich, in his analysis of contemporary halakhic issues, explores Albo's view on Cain's actions and their ethical implications.

Indeed, R. Joseph Albo maintains that renunciation of the consumption of meat for reasons of concern for animal welfare is not only morally erroneous but even repugnant. Albo asserts that this was the intellectual error committed by Cain and that it was this error that was the root cause of Cain's act of fratricide. Scripture reports that Cain brought a sacrifice of the produce of the land while Abel offered a sacrifice from the animals of his flock. Albo opines that Cain did not offer an animal sacrifice because he regarded men and animals as equals and, accordingly…

Contemporary Halakhic Problems, Vol III, Part II, Chapter X Vegetarianism and Judaism 12

The Mystical Implications of Cain's Sacrifice

CHASIDUT

According to Rabbi Nachman of Breslov in his work Likutei Moharan, Cain's failure to embody the 'light of the tefilin' led to his separation from Eden and his downfall. This mystical interpretation highlights that Cain's shortcomings and subsequent exile were due to his failure to attain the spiritual illumination symbolized by the tefilin.

But concerning Kayin, who was from the pollution of the Serpent, it is written (Genesis 4:6), “Why is your face fallen?” This is an aspect of the tefilin’s light, which is the radiance of the facial skin. <And he brought a sacrifice> from the dregs (Bereishit Rabbah 22:5) —seeing fault in everyone. We also find: “Then He placed a mark on Kayin” (Genesis 4:15) —a keren shone from him, as explained above. This is as is written of Kayin (ibid.: 16), “He settled in Nod, kidmat (east of) Eden…

Likutei Moharan 38:6:6

The Ethics of Cain's Punishment

JEWISH THOUGHT

Rabbi Joseph Albo questions the severity of Cain's punishment and the lack of divine intervention to protect Abel, raising profound ethical and theological issues. In his 15th-century philosophical work, Sefer HaIkkarim, Rabbi Joseph Albo delves into the complexities of divine justice and human morality, particularly in the context of Cain and Abel's story.

And if we say that Cain’s sin consisted in the fact that he did not bring of the fruit of the tree but only of the fruit of the ground, as we said before, this did not deserve such severe punishment as is expressed in the verse, “If thou doest well, shall it not be lifted up? and if thou doest not well, sin coucheth at the door …” The question also suggests itself, since God favored Abel as well as his present, how is it that he was killed? Why did not an angel of God protect the God-fearing man and save him from death? Another question is, why is it that we read about Seth…

Sefer HaIkkarim, Maamar 3 15:2

The Moral Implications of Cain's Sacrifice

COMMENTARY

Rabbi Sacks delves into the moral and intellectual errors of Cain and Abel, offering a profound exploration of the status of animals relative to humans. In his "Covenant and Conversation" series, Rabbi Jonathan Sacks provides a philosophical and theological analysis of the sacrifices of Cain and Abel, and the permission to eat meat post-Flood.

Albo’s theory took as its starting point not sacrifices but two other questions. The first: Why after the Flood did God permit human beings to eat meat? (Gen. 9:3–5). Initially, neither human beings nor animals had been meat eaters (Gen. 1:29–30). What caused God, as it were, to change His mind? The second: What was wrong with the first act of sacrifice, Cain’s offering of “some of the fruits of the soil” (Gen. 4:3–5)? God’s rejection of that offering led directly to the first murder, when Cain killed Abel. What was at stake in the difference between the offerings Cain and Abel brought to God?

Covenant and Conversation; Leviticus; The Book of Holiness, Tzav, Violence and the Sacred 14

The Importance of Sincere Offerings

MUSAR

Cain's offering lacked the sincerity and quality that Abel's offering had. In his 18th-century ethical work, Mesillat Yesharim, Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto emphasizes the importance of sincerity and quality in one's offerings to God.

We also find by Kayin and Hevel (Bereishis Raba 22:5): "Hevel brought from the first born of his sheep and of their fats". While, as they explained, Kayin brought from among the worst of the fruits of the land. What was the result? "and the L-rd turned to Hevel and his offering, but for Kayin and his offering He paid no heed" (Bereishis 4:5).

Mesillat Yesharim 19:54

The Consequences of a Poor Offering

MIDRASH

Cain's jealousy and eventual desire to kill Abel stemmed from offering the very worst of his produce. The medieval midrash Sefer HaYashar provides additional details and motivations behind the biblical story of Cain and Abel.

And Cain brought from the fruit of the ground and Abel brought from the fat firstlings of his ‎sheep. And the Lord turned and had respect unto Abel and to his offering and fire came down from ‎heaven and consumed it.‎ And unto Cain and to his offering the Lord did not incline and had no respect; for he offered ‎unto the Lord from the very worst of the fruits of the ground.‎ And Cain became jealous of his brother Abel on that account and desired to find some pretext ‎to kill him.‎ And it came to pass some time after this, that Cain and his brother Abel went out into the field ‎to do their work…

Sefer HaYashar (midrash), Book of Genesis, Bereshit 6

The Timing of Cain's Sacrifice

SECOND TEMPLE

Cain's offering of the fruits of the earth to the Lord after some days raises questions about the nature and timing of his sacrifice. Philo of Alexandria, a first-century Jewish philosopher, provides a unique interpretation of Cain's actions and their implications.

II. (11–49). And Abel became a shepherd of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the land. v. 3 III. (50–87). And it came to pass after some days that Cain brought of the fruits of the earth as a sacrifice to the Lord. v. 4 IV. (88-end). And Abel brought also himself of the first-born of his sheep and of their fats.

On the Birth of Abel and the Sacrifices Offered by him and by his Brother Cain, Introduction 4-6

God accepting the sacrifice of Abel, having rejected the offer of Cain, Willem van Herp, (c. 1614-1677)

Relatedראו גם

Sheetsדפי מקורות

Related Sheets